Madrid, The country Fruit Attraction may be the worldwide trade event focusing
within the many areas of the vegetable and fruit industry including packaging
and processing. Urschel International's new network marketing office, Urschel
Espaa S.L. have a strong presence in the fair.
Throughout the three-day event at
Feria de Madrid, October 16-18, three Urschel cutting machines is going to be
displayed at stand number 9G14 : the E TranSlicer Cutter, the DiversaCut Sprint
Dicer, and also the Comitrol Processor Model 1700. This provides an invaluable
chance for clients to see this top-selling food cutting equipment close up.
Creating precision slices with maximum flexibility, the belt-given E TranSlicer
yields an array of crinkle slices, flat slices, or julienne strips by way of
interchangeable slicing wheels. Hinged and sliding machine sections offer full
use of all key regions of the device for maintenance and wash-lower methods.
Ideally suited to promising small to mid-size processors, the DiversaCut Sprint
provides flat or crinkle slices/strips and dices. Popular programs include: 6.4
mm dices of let's eat some onions, tomato plants, all kinds of peppers 7 mm
crinkle strip cuts of taters 19 mm dices of tomato plants.
The Comitrol
Processor excels at milling and granulating popular programs include
fruit/vegetable juices, various pastes, and sauces. The actual cutting action as
well as other cutting heads allow quality processing of an array of food items.
Co-organized by IFEMA and FEPEX, the Fruit Attraction Fair, presently in the
fifth effective year, is definitely an annual trade event that develops
business-to-business associations, and uncovers the most recent in new items,
technology, and services. An engineering driven company founded in 1910, Urschel
Laboratories, Corporation. is constantly on the partner with food processors all
over the world to give the latest in cutting machinery.
Thursday, March 31, 2016
Big ag, monsanto dominate research colleges and switch them intopro-industry propaganda machines
In that old days before food and agriculturalcorporations consolidated in to the
behemoths we all know them as today,farming institutions of greater learning
were devoted toconducting impartial research into cutting-edge food production
andcrop systems that achieved positive results society in general. However
nowadays, theseformer "land-grant" colleges have largely mutated
intopro-industry, propaganda machines funded and controlled bycorporate
agro-titans like Monsanto that steer research efforts infavor of
genetically-modified (GMOs) and chemical-based cropsystems.
Inside a scathing indictment of the sinister, and quickly growing,type of farming fascism, Tom Philpott from Mother Johnson dissects a current Food & Water Watch (FWW) report that is freely revealed that corporateagriculture and also the pharmaceutical industry have essentially boughtout farming research education as you may know it. Schools anduniversities that when received the majority of their research fundingfrom the us government now receive it from Monsanto, DuPont,yet others, as well as their research efforts be affected by it. Schools that started as cultivators of 'open-source' agriculture arenow incubators of patented, corporate agriculture Institutions of greater learning like the College of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UofI) for example, or Iowa Condition College (ISU) were initially founded as land-grant schoolsThat meansthe authorities assisted fund their building on federal landfor the objective of researching and teaching agriculture, science,and engineering for public benefit. However nowadays, a lot of theseland-grant schools have basically been absorbed by privateinterests with little concern for anything apart from their ownprofits. "The thought of the land grants or loans ended up being to generate farming research,funded by the us government, that achieved positive results society as awhole. And that is virtually how things selected the firstcentury," creates Philpott.
"However, beginning within the eighties, thefederal government began to level off its purchase of agresearch [...] This is when food and agribusiness companies, whichwere then while consolidating in to the vast globalenterprises we all know today, started to funnel immeasureable cashinto land grants or loans." But the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)That accustomed to more carefully represent the interests of thepeople, is becoming simply an instrument for marketing industryinterests instead of public interests. So if the fundingcomes in the USDA or from private industry, it isessentially all now going for the promotion of GMOs andchemical-crop systems -- little, or no, can be used to developimprovements in non-GMO, organic, and sustainable agriculturesystems. Mother Johnson commenter Linda Ferris stated it best when she authored, "The 'sellout' by schools and colleges isn't any surprise for visitors whohave resided in towns around any of the systems mentionedin the content [...] This (farming schools) is Monsanto's newincubator of technology and propaganda -- a factory of creating moneyon a budget by controlling these institutions and taking advantage of theirstudents to complete their research and work."
Inside a scathing indictment of the sinister, and quickly growing,type of farming fascism, Tom Philpott from Mother Johnson dissects a current Food & Water Watch (FWW) report that is freely revealed that corporateagriculture and also the pharmaceutical industry have essentially boughtout farming research education as you may know it. Schools anduniversities that when received the majority of their research fundingfrom the us government now receive it from Monsanto, DuPont,yet others, as well as their research efforts be affected by it. Schools that started as cultivators of 'open-source' agriculture arenow incubators of patented, corporate agriculture Institutions of greater learning like the College of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UofI) for example, or Iowa Condition College (ISU) were initially founded as land-grant schoolsThat meansthe authorities assisted fund their building on federal landfor the objective of researching and teaching agriculture, science,and engineering for public benefit. However nowadays, a lot of theseland-grant schools have basically been absorbed by privateinterests with little concern for anything apart from their ownprofits. "The thought of the land grants or loans ended up being to generate farming research,funded by the us government, that achieved positive results society as awhole. And that is virtually how things selected the firstcentury," creates Philpott.
"However, beginning within the eighties, thefederal government began to level off its purchase of agresearch [...] This is when food and agribusiness companies, whichwere then while consolidating in to the vast globalenterprises we all know today, started to funnel immeasureable cashinto land grants or loans." But the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)That accustomed to more carefully represent the interests of thepeople, is becoming simply an instrument for marketing industryinterests instead of public interests. So if the fundingcomes in the USDA or from private industry, it isessentially all now going for the promotion of GMOs andchemical-crop systems -- little, or no, can be used to developimprovements in non-GMO, organic, and sustainable agriculturesystems. Mother Johnson commenter Linda Ferris stated it best when she authored, "The 'sellout' by schools and colleges isn't any surprise for visitors whohave resided in towns around any of the systems mentionedin the content [...] This (farming schools) is Monsanto's newincubator of technology and propaganda -- a factory of creating moneyon a budget by controlling these institutions and taking advantage of theirstudents to complete their research and work."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)